PLEASE READ MY THOUGHTS ON VITTER OVER EDWARDS FOR GOVERNOR - by SARA WOOD         (Click on PDF logo to share or print)

Listen y'all, this is long, but I ask humbly, even in this drive-thru, 10 second society at fault that you try to spare the time to read it because this governor's election is very important in light of the next huge one in 2016 and it took me a long darn time to write it. These thoughts are for the consideration of those who believe in the Republican platform but to those that do not, then you may not want to read this because it probably won't really make a difference and it is SOLELY an expression of my thoughts and I am an unpaid nobody, who researches and finds comfort in writing and just really understands that you cannot flirt with the growth of government, to any degree, for long, before you become slaves to it and with every vote, I try never to lose sight of that.

 Before I start I have to say again right off the bat--

If you are NOT a Democrat, why IN THIS DAY AND AGE OF ITS BLATANT SOCIALIST/COMMUNIST AGENDA TO AN UNDENIABLE DEGREE AND AS HERE WITH JOHN BEL EDWARDS’ IN SMALL HIDDEN DEGREES, would you vote Democrat?????  PLEASE DO NOT DO THIS.  WE HAVE A CHOICE.   JOIN Conservatives to PUT IN OFFICE A PERSON WHO WE CAN ACTUALLY influence because we already have in so many ways through the years, but especially in his yielding to us on the Common Core against his moneyed supporters and that person is David Vitter.  Put someone in office who will surround himself with people who believe in Conservatism, where you have MORE THAN a remote chance of influence and that is with someone whose voting record is of a conservative and whether you admit it or not, those votes belong to DAVID VITTER.  Edwards is not pro-life, if he failed repeatedly to support the essence of religious liberty and that is the right to conscientious objection; Edwards is not pro-second amendment, if he voted in favor of burdens like gun registration; Edwards is not against Common Core, if he voted to prevent a vote by all House members to stop Common Core; Edwards is not against this faux teacher accountability system, if he voted to tie a stupid unreliable student test to their job evaluations.  THESE ARE EDWARDS’ VOTES AND YOU CAN JUSTIFY THEM ALL YOU WANT BUT THE VOTE REMAINS.  SEE Link at the end.   VITTER DID NOT VOTE FOR THIS AND HE WILL WORK TO PROTECT AND BOLSTER THESE IN LIGHT OF THE ATTACKS OF WHICH EDWARDS SEEMS BLIND. 

DON’T GET DISTRACTED BY THE CONTRAST IN THE CANDIDATES’ PERSONALITIES AND LOOK AT THE VOTES!!! 

This piece of writing for me started when I was asked by a John Bel Edwards supporter to forward HER rationale for ignoring the horribly liberal-progressive-radical Democrats, supporting Edwards’ fundraiser, those who include the likes of Walt Leger, a prominent pro-Common Core promoter and vocal enemy of anti-CC parents.  I do not know this woman, personally, and she is not on my email list and further I do not support Edwards.  So I see no reason in forwarding something from someone I don’t really know on a candidate that I adamantly oppose as Governor.  It really got me thinking, though, so I will however, take the opportunity to express a lot of thoughts on this race, so please hang on and read through, because I hope it will be helpful to any undecided Republicans, Independents, Libertarians or Lord forbid, Conservatives.    

I have observed John Bel Edwards in session and he seems like a nice man, but he has a socialist philosophy for government that CANNOT BE IGNORED because now more than ever before, it is imminently dangerous to individual liberty, and that matters a lot, whether he acts to realize that philosophy with compassion or cruelty.  So being nice or honest, as opposed to being mean and manipulative, is really irrelevant, if what he seeks is to grow and/or empower government, because the price of that is always to the loss or diminishment of individual freedom; whether you are nice or mean about it, whether you are an honorable West Point graduate or anybody else with less distinction.